![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 20:05:53
@davidfowl But there has to be a reason, that main-stream OO-Languages have used nominal subtyping in the last 20 years.
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 20:05:46
@davidfowl I understand, that from a functional point of view, structural subtyping is a nice thing ...
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 20:05:46
@davidfowl I understand, that from a functional point of view, structural subtyping is a nice thing ...
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 19:52:14
@davidfowl i think the reason, we have that in TypeScript and Dart is that we have to create supertypes for javascript-things subsequently.
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 19:52:14
@davidfowl i think the reason, we have that in TypeScript and Dart is that we have to create supertypes for javascript-things subsequently.
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 19:48:22
@davidfowl who says that interfaces do not build a IS-A-Relationship?
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 19:47:19
@davidfowl and structural subtyping leads to sw that is less self-describing. we had this in C and C++ and discarded it for a good reason.
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 19:43:32
@davidfowl Not sure, that this is a great feature. A having members that are a subset of the members of B does not mean that a B *is* an A
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 18:55:13
@michelebusta @julielerman http://t.co/ESHgUn3u8p's provider really works fine. Whish I could say the same about the official ora-provider
|
![Foto ,]()
03.01.2014 18:41:09
RT @MasoudMassi: "2013 ist Continuous Delivery im Mainstream ankommen" | JAXenter.de http://t.co/3KqRFdnEWK
|
![Foto ,]()
02.01.2014 02:58:13
RT @julielerman: RT @skift: 2014 Needs to Be the Year of Free Hotel Wi-Fi http://t.co/CgBRWdOa8v /via @LaurenGoode
|
![Foto ,]()
01.01.2014 02:55:26
RT @BASTAcon: Happy New Year, Folks! We look forward to seeing you in 2014!
|
![Foto ,]()
31.12.2013 22:23:55
RT @slace: Just in time for NYE - LINQ in JavaScript with ES6, for real this time: http://t.co/nF4gT5bHK8
|
![Foto ,]()
31.12.2013 22:23:38
@leastprivilege Btw: Wie gehst Du mit dem Problem um, dass der JWT Handler Tokens mit mehreren Aud-Claims nicht korrekt validiert?
|
![Foto ,]()
31.12.2013 22:20:21
@leastprivilege Hab das diese Tage auch gemacht. Macht schon Spass, diese "neue" Nicht-WS-*-Welt. Fühlt sich irgendwie richtiger an ...
|